Daytona Beach Gun Crimes Lawyer

Aggressive Defense Against Firearm and Weapons Charges in Daytona Beach, Volusia County, and Flagler County

Being arrested for a gun crime in Florida can change your life overnight.

Many people are surprised to learn that a firearm charge can carry mandatory prison sentences, even for first-time offenders. A simple traffic stop, a firearm discovered during a search, an argument that escalates into allegations of aggravated assault, or possession of a weapon by a convicted felon can expose a person to years or even decades in prison.

If you have been charged with a gun crime in Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormond Beach, Port Orange, Palm Coast, Bunnell, or anywhere in Volusia or Flagler County, you need an experienced criminal defense attorney who understands both Florida firearms laws and the constitutional protections that apply to every citizen.

Patrick J. McGeehan is a former police detective and experienced Florida criminal defense lawyer who represents individuals accused of firearm offenses throughout Central Florida. As a former law enforcement officer, he understands how gun crime investigations are conducted, how evidence is gathered, and where mistakes are often made by police officers and prosecutors.

The State of Florida aggressively prosecutes firearm-related offenses. Prosecutors often seek mandatory minimum prison sentences under Florida’s firearm enhancement statutes, including the well-known “10-20-Life” law. Certain firearm offenses can result in lengthy prison terms, substantial fines, probation, loss of firearm rights, and a permanent felony record.

However, an arrest is not a conviction.

Every case must be carefully reviewed to determine whether law enforcement violated constitutional protections, whether the firearm was lawfully possessed, whether the search was legal, whether witnesses are credible, and whether the State can actually prove every element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt.

Florida Gun Crime Charges We Defend

Our office represents clients accused of virtually every type of firearm and weapons offense, including:

Possession of a Firearm by a Convicted Felon

Florida law generally prohibits convicted felons from possessing firearms or ammunition. A conviction can result in a lengthy prison sentence and may trigger mandatory minimum sentencing provisions.

These cases frequently involve disputes regarding:

• Actual possession versus constructive possession
• Joint occupancy of vehicles or residences
• Ownership of the firearm
• Knowledge of the firearm’s presence
• Illegal searches and seizures
• Suppression issues involving traffic stops

Many people assume that simply being near a firearm is enough to establish guilt. That is not always true. The State must prove that the accused knowingly possessed the firearm and exercised control over it.

Aggravated Assault with a Firearm

Aggravated assault with a firearm is one of the most commonly charged gun crimes in Florida.

These allegations often arise from:

• Road rage incidents
• Domestic disputes
• Neighborhood disagreements
• Business disputes
• Self-defense situations

Frequently, no shots are fired.

Instead, prosecutors allege that a firearm was displayed or used in a threatening manner.

The circumstances surrounding these cases are often highly disputed. Witnesses may provide conflicting accounts, emotions may be running high, and law enforcement officers often arrive after the incident has already occurred.

In many cases, self-defense or defense of others may be available.

Armed Robbery

Armed robbery is among the most serious firearm offenses prosecuted in Florida.

A conviction may expose a defendant to life-altering penalties, including lengthy mandatory prison sentences.

Prosecutors often rely upon:

• Eyewitness identifications
• Surveillance footage
• Cell phone records
• DNA evidence
• Fingerprint evidence
• Co-defendant testimony

These cases require immediate and aggressive investigation.

Witness identification procedures, photo lineups, and forensic evidence must be carefully scrutinized to determine whether law enforcement followed proper procedures.

Carrying a Concealed Firearm

Although Florida has expanded firearm carry rights in recent years, certain firearm possession and carry restrictions remain in place. Individuals can still face criminal charges when prosecutors allege violations of Florida weapons laws.

Potential defenses may involve:

• Constitutional challenges
• Lack of probable cause
• Illegal detention
• Unlawful search
• Mistaken identity
• Statutory exemptions

Improper Exhibition of a Firearm

A firearm does not need to be discharged for criminal charges to be filed.

Florida law may criminalize displaying a firearm in an angry, careless, threatening, or reckless manner under certain circumstances.

These allegations frequently arise after:

• Arguments
• Road rage incidents
• Neighborhood disputes
• Parking lot confrontations
• Business disagreements

The facts often become highly contested, making witness credibility a critical issue.

Shooting Into an Occupied Vehicle, Building, or Dwelling

These offenses are aggressively prosecuted because they involve a substantial risk of injury or death.

Potential defenses may include:

• Misidentification
• Lack of proof regarding the shooter
• Self-defense
• Stand Your Ground immunity
• Insufficient forensic evidence

Possession of a Firearm During the Commission of a Felony

A firearm can dramatically increase the potential penalties associated with another criminal offense.

Drug trafficking, robbery, burglary, aggravated battery, kidnapping, and numerous other offenses may trigger enhanced penalties when a firearm is allegedly possessed, displayed, discharged, or used during the commission of the offense.

Understanding Florida’s 10-20-Life Law

One of the most important issues in any gun crime case is determining whether Florida’s firearm enhancement statutes apply.

Florida’s “10-20-Life” law imposes mandatory minimum prison sentences for certain felony offenses involving firearms. The law can require:

• 10 years if a firearm is possessed during certain qualifying felonies
• 20 years if a firearm is discharged
• 25 years to life if a firearm discharge causes death or great bodily harm

These mandatory minimum sentences can apply even when the defendant has little or no prior criminal history.

Mandatory minimum sentencing issues frequently become the most important aspect of the defense strategy because they significantly impact plea negotiations, trial decisions, and sentencing exposure.

An experienced defense attorney must evaluate whether the enhancement actually applies, whether the evidence supports the enhancement, and whether constitutional or factual defenses exist.

Constitutional Defenses to Florida Gun Crime Charges

The Constitution Does Not Stop Protecting You After an Arrest

Many people assume that once a firearm is found, the case is over.

That is simply not true.

Some of the strongest defenses in gun crime cases have nothing to do with whether a firearm was actually present. Instead, they involve whether law enforcement officers followed the Constitution when obtaining evidence.

The United States Constitution protects citizens from unreasonable searches, unlawful seizures, coerced confessions, and violations of due process. When police officers violate those constitutional protections, courts may suppress evidence, exclude statements, or dismiss criminal charges altogether.

In many firearm prosecutions, constitutional issues become the centerpiece of the defense.

As a former police detective, attorney Patrick J. McGeehan understands how firearm investigations are conducted and where constitutional mistakes frequently occur. Law enforcement officers are required to follow strict legal procedures. When they fail to do so, the State may lose the ability to use critical evidence at trial.

The Fourth Amendment and Firearm Cases

The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects individuals against unreasonable searches and seizures.

In practical terms, this means police officers generally cannot:

• Stop people without legal justification
• Search vehicles without legal authority
• Search homes without a warrant or exception
• Seize firearms unlawfully
• Extend traffic stops without reasonable suspicion
• Conduct fishing expeditions hoping to find evidence

The Fourth Amendment applies whether the firearm is legally possessed or allegedly illegal.

Even if prosecutors believe they have discovered incriminating evidence, courts may suppress that evidence if officers violated constitutional protections when obtaining it.

Illegal Traffic Stops

Traffic stops are one of the most common ways firearm investigations begin.

Examples include:

• Speeding stops
• Equipment violations
• Expired registrations
• Improper lane changes
• Alleged reckless driving

Many firearm arrests begin with what appears to be a routine traffic stop.

The legal question becomes whether the officer had a valid basis to stop the vehicle in the first place.

If the stop was unlawful, evidence discovered afterward may be suppressed.

Potential issues include:

• Mistaken observations
• Lack of probable cause
• Unsupported reasonable suspicion
• Prolonged detention
• Improper K-9 deployments

A constitutional challenge to the traffic stop can sometimes eliminate the State’s most important evidence.

Illegal Vehicle Searches

The Fourth Amendment generally requires law enforcement to obtain legal authority before searching a vehicle.

Officers often claim one of several exceptions:

• Consent
• Probable cause
• Search incident to arrest
• Plain view
• Inventory searches

Each exception has specific legal requirements.

For example, consent must generally be voluntary.

A person who submits to authority because they feel intimidated or coerced may not have provided legally valid consent.

Similarly, officers cannot simply search every vehicle they stop.

Courts routinely examine whether officers actually possessed sufficient legal justification before conducting a search.

Unlawful Home Searches

The home receives the highest level of constitutional protection.

Police officers generally must obtain a search warrant before entering and searching a residence.

Certain exceptions may apply, including:

• Consent
• Exigent circumstances
• Emergency situations
• Protective sweeps

However, these exceptions are narrowly interpreted by courts.

When officers enter a residence unlawfully and discover firearms, a motion to suppress may become a critical defense strategy.

Search Warrants Are Not Automatically Valid

Many people assume that because police obtained a warrant, the search must have been legal.

That assumption is often incorrect.

Search warrants can be challenged for numerous reasons.

Potential issues include:

• False statements in warrant affidavits
• Material omissions
• Lack of probable cause
• Overly broad warrant language
• Execution errors
• Stale information

A warrant signed by a judge is not immune from challenge.

Courts routinely invalidate search warrants when constitutional requirements have not been satisfied.

Constructive Possession Defenses

One of the most misunderstood areas of Florida firearm law involves constructive possession.

The State is not always required to prove that a firearm was physically held by the accused.

Instead, prosecutors sometimes attempt to prove constructive possession.

Constructive possession generally requires proof that:

• The defendant knew the firearm was present; and
• The defendant exercised dominion and control over it.

This becomes particularly important in cases involving:

• Shared vehicles
• Shared residences
• Multiple occupants
• Borrowed vehicles
• Family homes

Simply being near a firearm does not automatically establish possession.

Consider the following examples:

• A firearm found under a passenger seat
• A firearm discovered in a roommate’s bedroom
• A weapon located inside a jointly occupied vehicle
• Ammunition found in a common area

In each of these situations, prosecutors may face substantial challenges proving constructive possession.

The Fifth Amendment and Firearm Cases

The Fifth Amendment protects individuals from self-incrimination.

Unfortunately, many gun crime prosecutions are strengthened by statements made after arrest.

Common examples include:

• “I forgot it was there.”
• “The gun belongs to me.”
• “I only had it for protection.”
• “I knew I wasn’t supposed to have it.”

These statements frequently become powerful evidence for prosecutors.

The best strategy is often simple:

Remain polite.

Remain respectful.

Request an attorney.

Stop answering questions.

Many successful defenses begin with a client who exercised the constitutional right to remain silent.

Miranda Violations

Before conducting custodial interrogation, officers are generally required to advise suspects of their Miranda rights.

Issues frequently arise when:

• Officers question suspects before warnings are given
• Questioning continues after an attorney is requested
• Statements are involuntary
• Officers use improper interrogation tactics

When Miranda violations occur, incriminating statements may be excluded from evidence.

Self-Defense and Firearm Charges

Not every display or use of a firearm is illegal.

Florida recognizes self-defense rights under appropriate circumstances.

In some cases, individuals are legally justified in:

• Displaying a firearm
• Threatening force
• Using force
• Using deadly force

Whether self-defense applies depends upon the specific facts of the incident.

Factors often examined include:

• Who initiated the confrontation
• Reasonableness of the perceived threat
• Witness credibility
• Physical evidence
• Surveillance footage
• Prior acts of violence

A thorough investigation is essential whenever self-defense may be involved.

Stand Your Ground Immunity

Florida’s Stand Your Ground law may provide immunity from criminal prosecution under certain circumstances.

If successful, a Stand Your Ground motion can result in dismissal of criminal charges before trial.

Stand Your Ground litigation often requires:

• Witness testimony
• Evidentiary hearings
• Physical evidence analysis
• Cross-examination
• Detailed legal briefing

These hearings can become case-dispositive and require careful preparation.

Why Constitutional Defenses Matter

Many firearm prosecutions appear strong on the surface.

However, once constitutional issues are examined, significant weaknesses often emerge.

Questions that must be answered include:

• Was the stop legal?
• Was the detention lawful?
• Was the search constitutional?
• Was consent voluntary?
• Was the warrant valid?
• Was the statement admissible?
• Was the firearm actually possessed?
• Does self-defense apply?

A criminal defense attorney’s job is not merely to react to allegations.

The job is to challenge every aspect of the State’s evidence and force prosecutors to prove their case lawfully and beyond a reasonable doubt.

Frequently Asked Questions About Florida Gun Crime Charges

Can I be charged if the gun was not in my hand?

Yes. Florida prosecutors may attempt to prove constructive possession. However, they must still prove that you knew the firearm was present and exercised dominion and control over it.

Can a passenger in a vehicle be charged with possessing a firearm?

Possibly. However, mere proximity is not enough. The State must establish knowing possession and control.

Can police search my vehicle just because they see a firearm?

Not automatically. Whether a search is lawful depends upon the specific circumstances and applicable exceptions to the warrant requirement.

What happens if police searched my vehicle illegally?

Evidence obtained through an unlawful search may be subject to suppression, potentially weakening or eliminating the prosecution’s case.

Can a convicted felon ever legally possess a firearm?

Generally, Florida and federal law prohibit convicted felons from possessing firearms unless firearm rights have been restored through lawful procedures.

What is Florida’s 10-20-Life law?

It is a sentencing enhancement statute that can impose mandatory prison terms for certain qualifying felonies involving firearms.

Is aggravated assault with a firearm a felony?

Yes. Aggravated assault with a firearm is a serious felony offense that can carry substantial penalties.

Can I claim self-defense if I displayed a firearm?

Possibly. Florida law recognizes self-defense under appropriate circumstances. Every case must be analyzed based upon its specific facts.

What is Stand Your Ground?

Stand Your Ground is a Florida law that may provide immunity from prosecution when force is legally justified.

Should I talk to police if I am accused of a gun crime?

In most situations, it is wise to politely decline questioning and request an attorney before making any statements.

Can firearm charges be dropped?

Yes. Charges may be dismissed for many reasons, including insufficient evidence, constitutional violations, witness credibility problems, or successful pretrial motions.

Will I lose my gun rights if convicted?

A felony conviction often results in the loss of firearm rights and may create both state and federal firearm disabilities.

What should I do after being arrested for a gun crime?

Contact an experienced criminal defense attorney immediately. Early intervention often provides the best opportunity to protect your rights and build an effective defense.

Illegal Searches, Traffic Stops, and Firearm Investigations in Florida

Many Florida Gun Crime Cases Begin With a Traffic Stop

A significant percentage of firearm arrests in Daytona Beach, Volusia County, Flagler County, and throughout Florida begin with a routine traffic stop.

What starts as a speeding ticket, a broken taillight investigation, a lane violation, or a seatbelt stop can quickly escalate into a felony firearm prosecution.

Law enforcement officers frequently encounter firearms during:

• Traffic stops
• DUI investigations
• Drug investigations
• Interstate interdiction operations
• Search warrant executions
• Domestic violence investigations
• Suspicious person calls
• Neighborhood disputes

When a firearm is discovered, many people assume there is no defense.

In reality, some of the strongest defenses arise from the manner in which law enforcement officers obtained the evidence.

The Constitution applies to firearm investigations just as it applies to every other criminal investigation.

If officers violated constitutional protections during a stop, detention, search, or interrogation, the resulting evidence may be suppressed.

Interstate 95 Traffic Stops and Gun Crime Investigations

Interstate 95 runs directly through Volusia County and Flagler County and is one of the busiest drug and criminal interdiction corridors in the country.

Law enforcement agencies operating along I-95 routinely conduct traffic enforcement and criminal interdiction operations.

These agencies may include:

• Florida Highway Patrol
• Sheriff’s Offices
• Local Police Departments
• Multi-agency task forces
• Drug interdiction units

Many firearm arrests occur after officers claim to observe:

• Speeding
• Following too closely
• Improper lane changes
• Window tint violations
• Equipment violations
• Failure to signal
• Registration issues

While many traffic stops are lawful, some are not.

A defense attorney must carefully examine:

• Dash camera footage
• Body camera footage
• Dispatch records
• CAD reports
• Traffic citations
• Officer reports

The question is often simple:

Did the officer actually have a legal basis to stop the vehicle?

If the answer is no, the evidence discovered afterward may be inadmissible.

The Real Purpose of Some Traffic Stops

In some cases, the stated reason for a traffic stop is only the beginning of the investigation.

An officer may suspect:

• Drug trafficking
• Illegal firearms possession
• Outstanding warrants
• Criminal activity

The Constitution permits officers to investigate criminal activity when supported by reasonable suspicion or probable cause.

However, officers may not simply stop citizens based upon a hunch.

The law requires objective facts supporting the detention.

One of the first issues examined by an experienced criminal defense lawyer is whether the stop was supported by sufficient legal justification.

When Traffic Stops Become Illegal

A stop that begins lawfully can later become unconstitutional.

For example, an officer may stop a vehicle for speeding.

The officer is generally permitted to:

• Obtain identification
• Check licenses
• Verify registration
• Investigate the traffic violation
• Issue a warning or citation

However, once the traffic investigation has concluded, the officer generally cannot continue detaining the occupants without additional legal justification.

Unfortunately, many firearm arrests occur after a traffic stop has been improperly extended.

Common issues include:

• Unnecessary delays
• Waiting for K-9 units
• Repeated questioning unrelated to the stop
• Fishing expeditions for unrelated criminal activity

When a detention exceeds constitutional limits, evidence discovered afterward may be subject to suppression.

Consent Searches and Firearm Cases

One of the most common justifications used by law enforcement officers is consent.

Officers frequently ask:

“Do you mind if I take a look inside your vehicle?”

Many citizens agree without realizing the legal consequences.

If consent is voluntarily given, officers may be authorized to conduct a search.

However, not every consent search is valid.

Important questions include:

• Was consent voluntary?
• Was the person intimidated?
• Were threats used?
• Was the person unlawfully detained when consent was requested?
• Did the person actually have authority to consent?

Even when consent is given, officers must remain within the scope of the consent granted.

A search that exceeds those limitations may become unlawful.

Firearms Found During Vehicle Searches

Firearms are commonly discovered:

• Under seats
• Inside center consoles
• In glove compartments
• In backpacks
• In trunks
• Inside locked containers

The discovery of a firearm does not automatically establish guilt.

Prosecutors must still prove:

• Possession
• Knowledge
• Intent when required
• Identity of the possessor

When multiple people occupy a vehicle, those issues become substantially more complicated.

The State often attempts to rely upon constructive possession theories.

Those theories frequently present opportunities for defense.

The Problem With Constructive Possession Cases

Consider a vehicle containing four occupants.

Officers discover a firearm beneath a seat.

Who possessed the firearm?

The answer is not always obvious.

The State cannot simply assume possession.

Instead, prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a specific individual knowingly possessed and controlled the firearm.

These cases often involve:

• Conflicting statements
• Shared access
• Joint occupancy
• Lack of fingerprints
• Lack of DNA evidence
• Credibility disputes

Constructive possession defenses frequently become one of the strongest issues in firearm prosecutions.

K-9 Searches and Firearm Investigations

Drug detection dogs are frequently used during roadside investigations.

Officers may attempt to justify vehicle searches through K-9 alerts.

However, constitutional issues often arise concerning:

• Length of detention
• Reliability of the dog
• Handler conduct
• Timing of deployment
• Basis for continued detention

If officers unlawfully prolong a stop while waiting for a K-9 unit, evidence discovered during the subsequent search may be challenged.

Search Warrants and Firearm Cases

Not all firearm arrests arise from traffic stops.

Many occur after law enforcement executes search warrants at homes, apartments, businesses, or storage units.

Search warrant cases often involve allegations of:

• Drug trafficking
• Firearms possession
• Gang activity
• Organized criminal activity
• Violent crimes

Although warrants are signed by judges, they are not automatically valid.

An attorney should carefully examine:

• The warrant affidavit
• Sources of information
• Confidential informants
• Surveillance reports
• Probable cause allegations
• Execution procedures

Errors in the warrant process can create significant constitutional defenses.

Confidential Informants and Gun Crime Investigations

Many firearm investigations rely upon confidential informants.

Informants often have motivations that affect credibility.

Examples include:

• Reduced charges
• Reduced sentences
• Financial payments
• Personal disputes
• Revenge motives

Courts recognize that informants are not always reliable.

When a firearm investigation depends heavily upon confidential information, the defense should closely scrutinize the source and circumstances of the information provided.

Firearms Found During Domestic Violence Investigations

Domestic violence calls frequently lead to firearm-related charges.

Officers responding to emotionally charged situations may make rapid decisions based upon incomplete information.

Allegations often include:

• Aggravated assault with a firearm
• Improper exhibition
• Brandishing
• Threats involving weapons
• Possession by prohibited persons

Because officers rarely witness the events themselves, these cases often depend upon conflicting witness accounts.

Credibility becomes critically important.

A thorough defense investigation may uncover:

• Contradictory statements
• Motive to fabricate
• Relationship disputes
• Text messages
• Social media evidence
• Independent witnesses

Body Cameras Often Change Everything

Modern firearm cases increasingly depend upon video evidence.

Body cameras and dash cameras frequently reveal facts omitted from police reports.

Video may establish:

• Whether consent was voluntary
• Whether a search occurred before consent
• Whether statements were coerced
• Whether officers prolonged the stop
• Whether witnesses changed their stories

Video evidence has become one of the most important tools available to criminal defense attorneys.

Suppression Motions Can Win Gun Cases

One of the most powerful weapons available to the defense is a Motion to Suppress.

A suppression motion asks the court to exclude evidence obtained through unconstitutional conduct.

Potential suppression issues include:

• Illegal traffic stops
• Unlawful detentions
• Invalid consent searches
• Illegal vehicle searches
• Defective search warrants
• Unlawful home entries
• Miranda violations
• Involuntary statements

If critical evidence is suppressed, prosecutors may:

• Reduce charges
• Offer more favorable plea agreements
• Dismiss charges entirely

In some cases, suppression litigation determines the outcome of the entire prosecution.

Why Former Detective Experience Matters

Firearm investigations often move quickly.

Police reports may appear convincing at first glance.

However, reports do not always tell the entire story.

As a former detective, Patrick J. McGeehan understands:

• How investigations are conducted
• How search warrants are prepared
• How witness statements are obtained
• How evidence is collected
• How constitutional mistakes occur

That experience provides valuable insight when evaluating firearm prosecutions and identifying potential defenses.

Early Intervention Can Make a Significant Difference

One of the biggest mistakes people make after an arrest is waiting too long to hire an attorney.

Critical evidence can disappear quickly.

Witness memories fade.

Video footage may be overwritten.

Cell phone records can be lost.

The earlier an attorney becomes involved, the greater the opportunity to:

• Preserve evidence
• Interview witnesses
• Challenge searches
• Investigate defenses
• Negotiate with prosecutors
• Prepare for trial

Every firearm case is different.

However, prompt action often creates the best opportunity to achieve a favorable outcome.

Frequently Asked Questions About Firearm Searches and Traffic Stops

Can police search my vehicle simply because I own a firearm?

Not necessarily. The existence of a firearm does not automatically eliminate Fourth Amendment protections.

Can I refuse consent to search my vehicle?

Generally, yes. Citizens retain constitutional rights during police encounters.

If I consented to a search, is my case over?

No. The circumstances surrounding the consent must still be examined to determine whether it was voluntary and legally valid.

Can police search a locked container inside my vehicle?

The answer depends upon the legal basis for the search and the specific facts involved.

What if someone else left the firearm in my vehicle?

The State must still prove that you knowingly possessed and controlled the firearm.

What happens if a search warrant was defective?

Evidence obtained through an invalid warrant may be subject to suppression.

Can body camera footage help my defense?

Absolutely. Body camera footage often provides important evidence regarding searches, statements, and officer conduct.

How often are firearm cases dismissed because of illegal searches?

Every case is different, but constitutional violations remain one of the most effective defenses in firearm prosecutions.

Should I answer questions if police find a firearm?

In most situations, it is wise to remain respectful, request an attorney, and avoid making statements that could later be used against you.

What should I do immediately after a firearm arrest?

Contact an experienced Daytona Beach criminal defense attorney as soon as possible to begin protecting your rights and preserving evidence.

Self-Defense, Stand Your Ground, and Aggravated Assault With a Firearm Charges in Florida

Not Every Display of a Firearm Is a Crime

One of the most misunderstood areas of Florida criminal law involves the lawful use of firearms for self-defense.

Many people are surprised to learn that an individual can be arrested, charged, and prosecuted even when they genuinely believed they were protecting themselves or another person.

In Daytona Beach, Port Orange, Ormond Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Palm Coast, and throughout Florida, law enforcement officers frequently arrest individuals following confrontations involving firearms. Often, the officer responding to the scene was not present when the incident occurred and must make a rapid decision based upon conflicting witness statements.

As a result, individuals acting in self-defense are sometimes arrested and charged with serious crimes such as:

• Aggravated Assault with a Firearm
• Aggravated Battery with a Firearm
• Improper Exhibition of a Firearm
• Shooting into an Occupied Vehicle
• Attempted Murder
• Manslaughter
• Murder

The fact that criminal charges have been filed does not necessarily mean the use of force was unlawful.

Florida law recognizes the right of individuals to defend themselves, defend others, and protect their homes under appropriate circumstances.

What Is Aggravated Assault With a Firearm?

Aggravated Assault with a Firearm is one of the most commonly prosecuted gun crimes in Florida.

Generally speaking, prosecutors allege that an individual intentionally threatened another person with a firearm in a manner that created a well-founded fear of imminent violence.

Importantly, a shot does not need to be fired.

Many aggravated assault cases involve allegations that someone:

• Pointed a firearm
• Displayed a firearm
• Retrieved a firearm during an argument
• Threatened another person while armed
• Brandished a firearm during a confrontation

These allegations often arise from emotionally charged situations where witness accounts differ significantly.

Common Situations Leading to Aggravated Assault Charges

Many firearm-related arrests stem from situations that escalated unexpectedly.

Common examples include:

Road Rage Incidents

Road rage allegations frequently result in aggravated assault charges.

Examples include:

• Drivers accusing one another of displaying firearms
• Following another vehicle
• Aggressive lane-change disputes
• Parking lot confrontations
• Traffic altercations

In many cases, no physical contact occurs.

Instead, the prosecution relies entirely upon witness testimony regarding what was allegedly displayed or said during the encounter.

Neighborhood Disputes

Property line disagreements, noise complaints, trespassing allegations, and ongoing neighbor conflicts sometimes escalate into firearm-related accusations.

These cases often involve:

• Long-standing disputes
• Prior police reports
• Conflicting witnesses
• Personal animosity

A thorough investigation frequently uncovers facts omitted from initial police reports.

Domestic Arguments

Domestic disputes are among the most common sources of aggravated assault allegations.

Law enforcement officers responding to domestic calls often encounter highly emotional situations where accusations may change over time.

Issues frequently arise regarding:

• Credibility
• Motive
• Prior relationship history
• Text messages
• Social media communications
• Witness bias

Business and Workplace Disputes

Arguments involving customers, employees, contractors, or business owners occasionally result in allegations involving firearms.

These incidents often occur in parking lots, offices, construction sites, and commercial properties.

Video evidence can become extremely important in determining what actually occurred.

Florida Self-Defense Law

Florida law recognizes that individuals may use force when reasonably necessary to protect themselves against unlawful force.

A person does not lose the right to self-defense simply because a firearm is involved.

The legal analysis often focuses upon:

• Who initiated the confrontation
• The nature of the threat
• The reasonableness of the person’s belief
• The immediacy of the danger
• Whether the force used was legally justified

Every self-defense case is heavily dependent upon the specific facts.

Small factual differences can dramatically affect the outcome.

The Difference Between Feeling Threatened and Being Legally Justified

Not every fear justifies the display or use of a firearm.

The law generally requires that the perceived threat be objectively reasonable.

This means courts often evaluate:

• What the defendant believed
• Whether that belief was reasonable
• What a reasonable person would have done under similar circumstances

For this reason, self-defense cases frequently require extensive factual investigation.

Florida’s Stand Your Ground Law

Florida’s Stand Your Ground law has received significant national attention.

Many people misunderstand how the law actually works.

Stand Your Ground does not create a license to threaten or shoot people.

Instead, it provides a legal mechanism through which a person may seek immunity from criminal prosecution when the use of force was legally justified.

When applicable, Stand Your Ground can result in dismissal of criminal charges before trial.

This makes it one of the most powerful defenses available in firearm cases.

What Is a Stand Your Ground Hearing?

A Stand Your Ground hearing is an evidentiary hearing conducted before a judge.

At the hearing, the court may consider:

• Witness testimony
• Surveillance footage
• Body camera recordings
• Physical evidence
• 911 recordings
• Expert testimony

The purpose of the hearing is to determine whether the defendant is entitled to immunity under Florida law.

If immunity is granted, criminal charges may be dismissed.

Why Witness Credibility Often Determines the Outcome

Most firearm-related confrontations occur quickly.

Frequently, there are only two primary witnesses:

• The accused
• The accuser

As a result, credibility becomes critically important.

A skilled defense attorney investigates:

• Prior inconsistent statements
• Bias
• Motive to fabricate
• Prior conflicts
• Criminal history
• Civil litigation motives

Witness credibility can become the deciding factor in many self-defense cases.

The Importance of 911 Calls

The first person who contacts law enforcement often gains an initial credibility advantage.

However, the first caller is not always the victim.

In many cases, careful review of 911 recordings reveals:

• Excited utterances
• Inconsistent accounts
• Admissions
• Statements supporting self-defense

911 recordings frequently become some of the most important evidence in firearm prosecutions.

Social Media Evidence Can Help or Hurt

Modern criminal investigations routinely include social media analysis.

Investigators often examine:

• Facebook posts
• Instagram messages
• Snapchat communications
• TikTok content
• Text messages
• Direct messages

These communications sometimes reveal:

• Prior threats
• Intentions
• Motives
• Admissions
• Evidence supporting self-defense

Both prosecutors and defense attorneys increasingly rely upon digital evidence in firearm cases.

Surveillance Video Has Changed Gun Crime Defense

Security cameras are everywhere.

Video may exist from:

• Homes
• Businesses
• Parking lots
• Traffic cameras
• Doorbell cameras
• Cellular phones

Video evidence often tells a dramatically different story than witness testimony.

A comprehensive defense investigation seeks to identify and preserve all available video evidence before it is lost or overwritten.

Cases Involving No Fired Shots

Many people assume firearm charges only arise when someone pulls the trigger.

That is incorrect.

Some of the most serious charges involve situations where no shot was ever fired.

Examples include allegations that a firearm was:

• Displayed
• Pointed
• Revealed during an argument
• Used to threaten another person

These cases frequently depend almost entirely upon witness testimony and credibility determinations.

Defending Against False Allegations

Unfortunately, false firearm accusations do occur.

Motives may include:

• Revenge
• Divorce proceedings
• Child custody disputes
• Personal conflicts
• Neighborhood disputes
• Financial disagreements

A thorough investigation often uncovers evidence that significantly undermines the prosecution’s case.

Why Early Investigation Matters

Time is critical in self-defense cases.

Evidence can disappear quickly.

Witness memories fade.

Video footage may be deleted.

Cell phone data may be lost.

The sooner a defense attorney begins investigating, the greater the opportunity to preserve evidence supporting the defense.

Common Defense Strategies in Firearm Self-Defense Cases

Potential defenses may include:

• Self-defense
• Defense of others
• Stand Your Ground immunity
• Lack of intent
• False allegations
• Mistaken identification
• Lack of credibility
• Insufficient evidence
• Constitutional violations
• Inconsistent witness testimony

Every case requires a defense strategy tailored to its specific facts.

Why Former Law Enforcement Experience Can Be Valuable

Firearm cases often require understanding how police officers evaluate threats and make arrest decisions.

As a former police detective, Patrick J. McGeehan understands:

• Police investigative procedures
• Report writing practices
• Witness interviewing techniques
• Evidence collection methods
• Use-of-force investigations

This experience provides valuable insight when analyzing firearm prosecutions and developing effective defense strategies.

Frequently Asked Questions About Self-Defense and Gun Charges

Can I be arrested even if I acted in self-defense?

Yes. Law enforcement officers sometimes arrest individuals who later establish self-defense or Stand Your Ground immunity.

What if I never fired the gun?

You can still be charged with offenses such as aggravated assault with a firearm even when no shots are fired.

Does displaying a firearm automatically make me guilty?

No. The surrounding circumstances determine whether the conduct was lawful or criminal.

What is the difference between self-defense and Stand Your Ground?

Self-defense is a legal justification. Stand Your Ground is a legal procedure that may provide immunity from prosecution before trial.

Can a Stand Your Ground motion get my case dismissed?

Yes. Successful Stand Your Ground motions can result in dismissal of criminal charges before trial.

Can I use a firearm to defend another person?

Under appropriate circumstances, Florida law recognizes the right to defend others.

What if the alleged victim threatened me first?

That fact may be highly relevant to a self-defense claim and should be thoroughly investigated.

Does Florida require me to retreat before defending myself?

Florida law generally does not impose a duty to retreat in situations where Stand Your Ground applies.

Can text messages help my defense?

Absolutely. Text messages often reveal threats, motives, credibility issues, and circumstances leading to the incident.

What should I do if I am accused of aggravated assault with a firearm?

Avoid discussing the case with anyone other than your attorney and seek legal representation immediately.

Accused of a Gun Crime in Daytona Beach, Volusia County, or Flagler County?

A firearm charge does not automatically mean a conviction.

Whether your case involves self-defense, Stand Your Ground immunity, aggravated assault allegations, road rage accusations, a domestic dispute, or a firearm discovered during a police investigation, every detail matters.

Patrick J. McGeehan is a former police detective and experienced Florida criminal defense attorney who aggressively defends individuals charged with firearm offenses throughout Daytona Beach, Deland, Port Orange, Ormond Beach, New Smyrna Beach, Palm Coast, Bunnell, Volusia County, and Flagler County.

The sooner an attorney becomes involved, the sooner evidence can be preserved, witnesses can be interviewed, and defenses can be developed.

Federal Gun Charges, Felon in Possession Cases, and Mandatory Minimum Sentences

Some Gun Crime Cases Become Federal Cases

Most firearm offenses in Daytona Beach, Volusia County, and Flagler County are prosecuted in Florida state courts.

However, certain gun crimes can quickly become federal criminal cases.

When federal authorities become involved, the stakes often increase dramatically.

Federal prosecutors typically have extensive investigative resources, including:

• Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
• Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF)
• Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)
• United States Marshals Service
• Homeland Security Investigations (HSI)

Federal firearm prosecutions often involve lengthy investigations, extensive forensic evidence, and significant sentencing exposure.

A person who believes they are facing a simple state firearm charge may suddenly find themselves under investigation by federal authorities.

Understanding the difference between state and federal gun prosecutions is critical.

State Gun Charges Versus Federal Gun Charges

Florida prosecutors enforce state firearm laws.

Federal prosecutors enforce federal firearm statutes.

Sometimes the same conduct can violate both state and federal law.

Examples include:

• Possession of a firearm by a convicted felon
• Drug trafficking involving firearms
• Possession of stolen firearms
• Firearm trafficking
• Straw purchases
• Possession of machine guns
• Possession of prohibited weapons
• Firearms used during violent crimes

Federal authorities generally focus on cases they view as having broader public safety implications or substantial criminal exposure.

Possession of a Firearm by a Convicted Felon

One of the most commonly prosecuted firearm offenses in both state and federal court involves possession of a firearm by a convicted felon.

Many people mistakenly believe prosecutors must prove the firearm was actually being carried.

That is not always true.

Both state and federal prosecutors may rely upon constructive possession theories.

Common situations include:

• Firearms found in vehicles
• Firearms found inside residences
• Firearms discovered during traffic stops
• Firearms located in jointly occupied property
• Firearms found during search warrant executions

The government must still prove possession beyond a reasonable doubt.

That issue frequently becomes the focus of the defense.

What Is Constructive Possession?

Constructive possession cases are often more complicated than prosecutors suggest.

The firearm may be:

• Under a seat
• Inside a closet
• Hidden in a vehicle
• Located in a shared residence
• Found in a backpack
• Discovered in a storage area

The government generally must prove that the accused:

• Knew the firearm existed; and
• Exercised dominion and control over it

Mere proximity is not necessarily enough.

This issue frequently creates substantial defenses in firearm prosecutions.

Firearms and Drug Investigations

Federal authorities often become involved when firearms are discovered during drug investigations.

Investigations involving:

• Drug trafficking
• Distribution offenses
• Manufacturing operations
• Organized criminal activity

frequently trigger enhanced scrutiny from federal agencies.

Prosecutors often argue that firearms were possessed to protect narcotics, money, or criminal activity.

These allegations can significantly increase sentencing exposure.

Firearm Enhancements Can Change Everything

Many defendants are surprised to learn that firearm enhancements may dramatically increase potential penalties.

Even where the firearm itself is not the primary charge, prosecutors may seek enhanced penalties based upon allegations that a firearm was:

• Possessed
• Carried
• Brandished
• Displayed
• Discharged
• Used during another offense

The presence of a firearm often becomes one of the most important issues in plea negotiations and trial preparation.

Federal Mandatory Minimum Sentences

Federal firearm statutes frequently contain mandatory minimum sentencing provisions.

Mandatory minimum sentences are important because they limit judicial discretion.

In certain circumstances, a judge may be required to impose a minimum prison sentence established by Congress.

This can dramatically affect:

• Plea negotiations
• Trial strategy
• Sentencing exposure
• Case evaluation

Understanding mandatory minimum issues is essential when evaluating any federal firearm prosecution.

What Is a Straw Purchase?

A straw purchase occurs when one person purchases a firearm on behalf of another person who is prohibited from possessing the firearm or who wishes to conceal their identity.

Federal authorities aggressively investigate alleged straw purchase schemes.

Common allegations include:

• False statements on firearm purchase forms
• Purchases for prohibited persons
• Purchases intended for trafficking
• Purchases intended to evade background checks

Many straw purchase cases involve extensive ATF investigations.

Firearm Trafficking Investigations

Federal agencies devote substantial resources to firearm trafficking investigations.

These investigations may involve allegations that firearms were:

• Purchased for resale
• Transported across state lines
• Sold to prohibited persons
• Distributed unlawfully

Federal investigators frequently rely upon:

• Surveillance
• Electronic communications
• Financial records
• Firearm tracing
• Cooperating witnesses

Early legal representation can be critical in these investigations.

ATF Investigations

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives plays a significant role in federal firearm enforcement.

ATF agents investigate:

• Firearm trafficking
• Straw purchases
• Possession offenses
• Firearm-related violent crimes
• Federal firearms license violations

Many people make the mistake of speaking with federal agents without legal representation.

That is rarely advisable.

Statements made during an investigation may later become important evidence.

When Federal Agents Want to Talk

Federal agents frequently approach individuals before charges are filed.

Common scenarios include:

• Home visits
• Telephone calls
• Requests for interviews
• Workplace contact
• Grand jury investigations

Many people incorrectly assume they can explain the situation and avoid charges.

Unfortunately, statements made during these interactions can create substantial problems later.

Before speaking with federal investigators, individuals should consult qualified legal counsel.

Search Warrants in Federal Gun Cases

Federal firearm investigations frequently involve search warrants.

These warrants may target:

• Homes
• Vehicles
• Businesses
• Storage facilities
• Electronic devices

A defense attorney should carefully review:

• Warrant affidavits
• Probable cause allegations
• Informant information
• Surveillance evidence
• Execution procedures

Constitutional challenges remain available in federal court just as they do in state court.

Digital Evidence in Federal Firearm Cases

Modern federal investigations often involve extensive digital evidence.

Investigators may examine:

• Cell phone data
• Text messages
• Email communications
• Social media activity
• Location information
• Cloud storage accounts

Digital evidence frequently becomes a major issue in federal firearm prosecutions.

A thorough review is essential.

Sentencing Guidelines Matter

Unlike many state cases, federal prosecutions often involve detailed sentencing guideline calculations.

Potential factors may include:

• Criminal history
• Number of firearms
• Type of firearm
• Alleged connection to other offenses
• Possession of ammunition
• Acceptance of responsibility

Sentencing calculations can significantly affect a defendant’s exposure.

Understanding these issues early is critical.

Constitutional Defenses Still Apply

Many people assume federal investigators cannot make mistakes.

That assumption is incorrect.

Federal agents remain bound by the Constitution.

Potential defenses may involve:

• Illegal searches
• Unlawful seizures
• Defective warrants
• Miranda violations
• Involuntary statements
• Lack of probable cause

Federal courts routinely suppress evidence when constitutional violations occur.

Why Early Intervention Is Critical

The best time to hire an attorney is often before charges are filed.

When a lawyer becomes involved early, opportunities may exist to:

• Communicate with investigators
• Preserve evidence
• Prevent damaging statements
• Analyze potential defenses
• Prepare for grand jury proceedings
• Evaluate constitutional challenges

Waiting until after an arrest may eliminate opportunities that previously existed.

Building an Effective Defense

Every firearm case requires an individualized strategy.

Potential defense issues may include:

• Lack of possession
• Lack of knowledge
• Constructive possession challenges
• Illegal searches
• Defective warrants
• Witness credibility
• Forensic weaknesses
• Chain-of-custody issues
• Constitutional violations

A thorough investigation often reveals weaknesses that are not immediately apparent from police reports or charging documents.

Why Clients Choose Patrick J. McGeehan

Gun crime allegations can place your freedom, reputation, and future at risk.

Patrick J. McGeehan brings a unique perspective to firearm cases as both a former police detective and experienced criminal defense attorney.

He understands:

• How firearm investigations are conducted
• How search warrants are prepared
• How prosecutors build gun crime cases
• How constitutional violations occur
• How to identify weaknesses in the government’s evidence

Whether the allegations involve a state firearm prosecution, a federal investigation, a felon-in-possession charge, an aggravated assault allegation, or a firearm enhancement, every case deserves a thorough and aggressive defense.

Frequently Asked Questions About Federal Gun Charges

Can a gun charge be prosecuted in federal court?

Yes. Certain firearm offenses fall within federal jurisdiction and may be prosecuted by the United States Attorney’s Office.

Is federal court more serious than state court?

Federal prosecutions often involve greater resources, more extensive investigations, and potentially significant sentencing exposure.

What is a felon-in-possession charge?

It is a criminal offense alleging that a convicted felon knowingly possessed a firearm or ammunition.

Can I be charged if the firearm belonged to someone else?

Possibly. Prosecutors may attempt to establish constructive possession, although they still must prove the necessary elements beyond a reasonable doubt.

What is a straw purchase?

A straw purchase generally involves purchasing a firearm on behalf of another person while concealing the true purchaser’s identity.

Should I talk to ATF agents?

Before speaking with any federal investigator, it is generally wise to consult an attorney.

Can federal agents search my home without a warrant?

Generally, a warrant or recognized exception to the warrant requirement is needed.

What happens if a search warrant was invalid?

Evidence obtained through an unconstitutional search may be subject to suppression.

Are federal mandatory minimum sentences automatic?

Not always. The applicability of mandatory minimum provisions depends upon the specific statute and facts of the case.

What should I do if I learn I am under federal investigation?

Contact an experienced criminal defense attorney immediately. Early intervention may significantly affect the outcome of the case.

Speak With a Daytona Beach Gun Crimes Defense Attorney Today

If you have been arrested for a firearm offense, accused of aggravated assault with a firearm, charged as a felon in possession, contacted by ATF agents, or are facing state or federal gun charges in Daytona Beach, Deland, Ormond Beach, Port Orange, New Smyrna Beach, Palm Coast, Flagler County, or Volusia County, do not wait to seek legal advice.

The decisions you make immediately after an arrest or investigation can have a lasting impact on your case.

Contact Patrick J. McGeehan today to discuss your situation, protect your rights, and begin building a strategic defense.

Frequently Asked Questions About Florida Gun Crime Charges

Can I legally carry a firearm in Florida?

Florida law regarding firearm possession and carry has changed significantly in recent years. Whether carrying a firearm is lawful depends on numerous factors, including the type of weapon, location, the person’s legal status, and other circumstances. If you have been arrested for a firearm-related offense, you should consult an attorney immediately.

Can I be charged with a gun crime even if the gun was never fired?

Yes. Many firearm offenses do not require the discharge of a weapon. Charges such as aggravated assault with a firearm, improper exhibition of a firearm, carrying a concealed firearm, and possession offenses may be filed even when no shots were fired.

What is aggravated assault with a firearm in Florida?

Aggravated assault with a firearm generally involves allegations that a person intentionally threatened another individual while using or displaying a firearm in a manner that created fear of imminent violence. It is a serious felony offense that may carry significant penalties.

What happens if I point a firearm at someone?

Depending on the circumstances, prosecutors may file charges ranging from improper exhibition of a firearm to aggravated assault with a firearm or more serious offenses. Self-defense may be available in certain situations.

Can I go to jail for displaying a firearm during an argument?

Yes. Depending on the facts, displaying a firearm during an argument can result in criminal charges. The specific circumstances surrounding the incident are critical to determining whether the conduct was lawful or criminal.

Can I be charged if a gun is found in my vehicle?

Possibly. Prosecutors must prove that you knowingly possessed the firearm. If multiple people had access to the vehicle, possession may become a disputed issue.

What if the firearm belonged to someone else?

Ownership and possession are different legal concepts. Even if someone else owns the firearm, prosecutors may attempt to prove possession. Every case requires careful evaluation.

Can a passenger be charged when a firearm is found inside a vehicle?

Yes. However, the State must still prove possession beyond a reasonable doubt. Mere presence in the vehicle is not automatically enough.

What is constructive possession?

Constructive possession is a legal theory used when a firearm is not physically found on a person’s body. Prosecutors generally must prove that the person knew about the firearm and exercised dominion and control over it.

Can I be arrested if police find a firearm in my home?

Yes. However, prosecutors must still prove the required legal elements of the offense. Shared residences often create factual disputes regarding possession.

Can police search my vehicle because they suspect I have a firearm?

Not automatically. Constitutional protections still apply. Whether a search was lawful depends on the facts and circumstances of the encounter.

What if police searched my vehicle without permission?

A defense attorney may evaluate whether the search violated the Fourth Amendment. Evidence obtained through an unlawful search may be subject to suppression.

What happens if police searched my home without a warrant?

Searches of homes generally require a warrant or a recognized exception to the warrant requirement. Unlawful searches may provide significant defenses.

What is a motion to suppress?

A motion to suppress asks the court to exclude evidence obtained through unconstitutional police conduct. Suppression issues frequently arise in firearm cases.

Can a gun charge be dismissed because of an illegal search?

Yes. If a court determines that law enforcement violated constitutional protections, important evidence may be excluded, which can significantly weaken the prosecution’s case.

What is Florida’s Stand Your Ground law?

Stand Your Ground is a law that may provide immunity from criminal prosecution when force is legally justified under Florida law.

What is the difference between self-defense and Stand Your Ground?

Self-defense is a legal justification for the use of force. Stand Your Ground is a legal procedure that may allow a defendant to seek immunity before trial.

Can I use a firearm to defend myself?

Under certain circumstances, Florida law permits individuals to use force in self-defense. Whether force was legally justified depends on the specific facts.

Can I use a firearm to defend my family?

Florida law may allow a person to defend another individual under appropriate circumstances. Every case is highly fact-specific.

Do I have to retreat before defending myself in Florida?

Florida law generally does not impose a duty to retreat in situations where Stand Your Ground applies.

What should I do if I am involved in a self-defense shooting?

You should seek legal counsel immediately and avoid making statements without first consulting an attorney.

What is a felon in possession of a firearm charge?

This charge generally alleges that a convicted felon knowingly possessed a firearm or ammunition.

Can a convicted felon ever legally possess a firearm?

In certain situations, firearm rights may be restored through lawful procedures. However, individuals should obtain legal advice before possessing firearms.

What is the penalty for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon?

The penalties can be severe and may include lengthy prison sentences, probation, fines, and the loss of civil rights.

What is Florida’s 10-20-Life law?

Florida’s firearm enhancement statute may impose mandatory minimum prison sentences for certain offenses involving firearms.

What does “mandatory minimum sentence” mean?

A mandatory minimum sentence is a minimum prison term established by law that a judge generally cannot reduce below a specified threshold.

Can I receive probation on a firearm charge?

It depends on the specific offense, criminal history, applicable sentencing laws, and facts of the case. Some firearm offenses carry mandatory prison exposure.

Can a firearm charge affect my ability to own guns in the future?

Yes. A conviction may affect firearm rights under both Florida and federal law.

Can I lose my concealed carry rights after a conviction?

Certain convictions may affect a person’s ability to lawfully possess or carry firearms in the future.

What happens if I am accused of using a firearm during another crime?

The firearm allegation may significantly increase the penalties associated with the underlying offense.

Can federal authorities prosecute gun crimes?

Yes. Certain firearm offenses may be prosecuted in federal court, sometimes resulting in substantial sentencing exposure.

What is the ATF?

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives is a federal agency that investigates firearm-related offenses.

Should I speak with ATF agents if they contact me?

Before speaking with any law enforcement officer or federal investigator, it is generally wise to consult legal counsel.

What should I do if I learn I am under investigation for a gun crime?

Contact an experienced criminal defense attorney immediately. Early intervention often provides the best opportunity to protect your rights and preserve defenses.

How soon should I hire a lawyer after a firearm arrest?

As soon as possible. Early representation can help preserve evidence, protect constitutional rights, and begin building an effective defense strategy.

Why choose Patrick J. McGeehan for a firearm case?

Patrick J. McGeehan is a former police detective and experienced Florida criminal defense attorney who represents clients charged with firearm offenses throughout Daytona Beach, Volusia County, Flagler County, and surrounding communities. His law enforcement background provides valuable insight into how firearm investigations are conducted and how defenses can be developed.

Do you represent clients throughout Volusia and Flagler Counties?

Yes. The firm represents clients charged with gun crimes in Daytona Beach, Deland, Ormond Beach, Port Orange, New Smyrna Beach, Palm Coast, Bunnell, Flagler Beach, and throughout Volusia and Flagler Counties.

Contact a Daytona Beach Gun Crimes Defense Lawyer Today

If you have been arrested for a firearm offense, accused of aggravated assault with a firearm, charged as a convicted felon in possession of a firearm, contacted by federal investigators, or are facing any weapons-related charge in Daytona Beach or the surrounding area, immediate legal representation can make a significant difference.

Patrick J. McGeehan is a former police detective and experienced criminal defense attorney who aggressively defends individuals accused of gun crimes throughout Volusia County and Flagler County.

The sooner you contact an attorney, the sooner evidence can be preserved, witnesses can be interviewed, constitutional issues can be investigated, and a strategic defense can begin.

Learn More About The Lindsey Isaacs Case

To view the complete timeline, court filings, press releases, media coverage, photographs, and detailed analysis of the investigation, visit:

13 Days: The Lindsey Isaacs Case

The page contains a comprehensive review of the investigation, arrest, defense strategy, dismissal of charges, and related civil litigation.

Resources:

Criminal Defense Page

Vehicular Homicide

DUI Manslaughter

Leaving the Scene of an Accident With a Death

Fatal Crash Investigations in Florida

Florida Highway Patrol Fatal Crash Investigations

Domestic Violence

DUI

Drug Crimes

Sex Crimes

Gun Crimes

Violent Crimes

Media Page